For universities & business schools

Your students will manage AI.
Who teaches them how humans behave around it?

I am Dima Levin: I have spent the last 12+ years implementing AI in businesses around the world, and I still run them day to day. I teach the part schools usually miss: LLM behaviour and human judgment — how the models actually behave, and how people actually work with them. One practical business case, one inspectable student output, one exam your students will remember.

Book a 20-minute fit call see the formats

Illustrated classroom workbench: a practitioner teaching students how to design and check an AI-assisted business workflow.
  1. Taught from live systems, not case studies

    Everything in the room traces to software running this week: a deal-intelligence platform doing the work of analysts, a bank-statement platform that has processed $1B+ across 30+ banks and payment providers, and a record of 150+ enterprise AI projects. When a student asks "but does this actually work?", I answer from last week.

  2. A name for the gap

    Schools teach how models are built. Almost nobody teaches how they behave — why a fluent answer can hide an unsupported commitment — or how professionals keep judgment when the machine drafts. That is the teachable surface, and it is where your graduates become dangerous (in the good way).

  3. An exam students remember

    Students design a real business workflow with AI, test the output, and defend the human decision. Then: open book with a familiar problem, closed book with a new one. The skill that survives is the one they keep.

Cone Red · GetDeal.AI · BankStore — operator record, principal public company data.

Teaching record

The session, concretely

One business case. One artifact they can defend.

In a single session, students take a real business request, design an AI-assisted workflow for it, test what the machine produces, and decide what a professional may and may not sign. They leave with a completed workflow blueprint — an artifact you can grade and they can show.

Exam analogy: on the left, a student with an open book solves a matching problem; on the right, the same student with a closed book faces a new problem. The skill that survives is the point.
The exam analogy: open book with the familiar problem, then closed book with a new one. What survives is what they learned.
  • Design — turn a real request into an AI-assisted workflow.
  • Test — find the spot where a fluent answer hides an unsupported commitment.
  • Defend — decide, and argue, what the human signs and what goes back.

Formats

Start free. Continue paid. Decide on fit.

  1. Step 1 · free

    Guest session

    60–90 minutes · no fee

    The full method live with your students: the case, the workflow, the exam moment. You see exactly what a paid engagement buys before spending anything.

  2. Step 2 · paid

    Case lab

    90 minutes · fee set with the programme

    A working session built around your course's business context. Students produce and defend the artifact; grading rubric provided.

  3. Step 3 · paid

    Module

    4 × 90 minutes · scoped with the course lead

    The full arc — from business request to defendable human decision — adapted to your semester, level and accreditation structure.

Teaching in English, Barcelona on campus or by video call. Level, cases and scope are adapted with the course lead.

Before we meet

Read how he thinks.

One call decides if this fits your course.

Twenty minutes: your cohort, the level, the learning need. If there is a fit, I propose an adapted outline, format and fee. My assistant joins the call to coordinate scheduling.

Book a 20-minute fit call back to the record